Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: 9600 for B&W & some potential options

2006-10-13 by Carl Schofield

I use the Colorburst Xphoto RIP with my 4000 and make my own CMYK  
profiles for the MIS K4 inks.  Works well with the 2200 also.  If you  
use the Epson UC inks there are canned profiles available that work  
quite well.
http://www.colorburstrip.com/

Carl

On Oct 13, 2006, at 6:37 PM, John Moody wrote:

> No, I did not find single RIP that equaled the Epson driver  
> performance for
> the 2200.  StudioPrint was not bad if you have to use something,  
> but the
> M/LM and C/LC partitions are fixed, so you are out of luck for what  
> you want
> to do with it.
> The Evolution RIP has great promise, but only works in 720x720  
> mode, with
> very few screening options.
>
> Please let me (us) know if you find something; I would very much  
> like to
> extend my 2200 life.
>
> Best regards,
> John Moody
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of  
> Paul Roark
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 5:49 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re: 9600 for B&W & some potential options
>
> Greg,
>
> The 2200 is a likely candidate for a test bed for the full color + B&W
> approach. Are there CMYK rips that can deal with such? Any  
> recommendations
> (cost being a factor)?
>
> (The 7500 approach is probably set for me now - 4K + LM & 50% LC  
> appears to
> work well.)
>
> Paul
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.