I bought IPv5.6 when I got my Epson 7600 almost 3 years ago and upgraded to IPv6 when it came out. I also got PhotoShop CS. I can tell you I love IP far more than I love PS - I mainly use PS just to use the Genuine Fractals plugin for enlarging my 8x10 and 11x14 scans up to 24x30. GF does a fabulous job for me and the latest version of GF has some great improvements. I print only B&W (for AAubreyBodine.com) and I really like the tint feature of IP - using it more and more. For the heavy lifting digital restoration work my team and I use Ulead's PhotoImpact (still using v6) - by far and away THE BEST tool for retouching - much faster and more convenient that what PS offers (for my needs). We've got 12,000 scans and so far restored almost 1,700 of them. This business is proving the truth of "the long tail" of retailing (see longtail.com for details). IP creates neutral B&W. We're a Windows shop and never have had a problem (but I do have 40 years of computer experience). I got enough support during the first year to get into a very productive workflow. So, in short, I do love IP. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, FRD <f.dz@...> wrote: > > I've been slowly absorbing the vast knowledge of this group over the past > few months. I am very new to inkjet printing but realized there could be > more to just printing natively off my newly acquired R2400 when I read > several glowing reviews on ImagePrint v6. > > Going over recent memory, I can't seem to recall anyone using this RIP and > if its made a huge difference in their prints. Is there some reason for > that? > > -- > > > > > Frank >
Message
Re: ImagePrint Gets No Love?
2006-10-25 by Richard Orban
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.