Tyler, I did nothing other than open it in IP with MY standard setting, allowing for the gamma setting of the print, and hit print. For those of you that don't use IP for your printing needs, or know nothing to little of the history of the IP RIP and Cone inks here you go. The RIP that Inkjet mall provided for the Peizo group was the ProB&W 24. It was sold along with several sets of inks in several tones. That RIP and those inks were then removed from the Inkjet Mall product line. They were replaced with new inks and the first choice offered up included IP. That however did not last long, and it was replaced with Studio Print. I had already paid for IP through another vendor and was not going to put out another $1500+ to get Studio Print. There has been no up dating of profiles and NO SUPPORT from EITHER Cone or Colorbyte on the newer inks. Colorbyte couldn't even tell me if they were made with museum black or photo black. These have two different dmax reading and life in the black lane. IP does have tone controls, ink limits, color spaces, etc. so there is control to a point, but they HOLD the key to new profiles and I simply have not paid them for custom profiles. I make prints with a created custom curve/tone within IP and ink limits set for different papers. While there are several profiles for older popular papers, nothing new is there. I am thrifty when I can be, and use a Kodak dial densitometer in my darkroom. I have checked it against local lab reading for both reflective and transmission and while it is still and eye ball measurement, I do OK with it. I have recently purchased the Print Fix Pro Suite, but that does not help for the IP side of life. For those that were there, I made several version Bs; two with my Peizo inks at different sharpnesses, and one with the 4800 ABW that through several tweaks got as close to the Sepia set of Cone as I could. The color space setting, as well as the rendering intent, effect the print in density. IP also has a slider from 1 to 100 to adjust the dmax. SINCE there is NO way I am paying these guys $500 for a custom profile, my work space is based upon a standard setup of positions; otherwise know as "eric's profile". Eric's profile was used to make version A. Who else on this list uses IP as their B&W print engine? The file did only go down to 95%, and that is an indication to me that maxium black IS NOT required, or that is Amadou's standard black point. Either way it is how the file came, so it was how the file was kept. Eric Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 214-827-8301 http://ericneilsenphotography.com Skype : ejprinter >...Eric's Piezo Sepia prints were nicely > optimized... but for a system with a significantly lower d-max and a heavy color > tint, so that put them in a different range. They look great by themselves, > but weak on a wall of prints with deeper blacks. The Peizo systems do not have a lower dmax than the majority of MK systems out there. In fact, I can't reach my Piezo dmax with my UCK3 9800 OEM setup. People familiar with these systems on this list over the years know that. What Eric may or may not have done to his file is unknown. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] B&W Print Off comments
2006-11-07 by Eric Neilsen Photo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.