Let's get this straight - It's not film that you're spoiled with but that drum scanner! My shooting style isn't compatible with medium format let alone 4x5, but if I had access to say a 16000dpi scanner for 35mm, AND the film and lenses could cope, then I too would be a digital knocker. Alternatively, would anyone like to put me together a 4x5 , 2000mm lens and a motor drive for $2000? :-) On Friday 18 Jan 2002 5:46 pm, mkravit wrote: > Larry, > > I think the point is...I am spoiled with film. I shoot T-Max 100 4x5 > and scan it on Howtek D4000 drum scanner up to 4000 dpi. I find > myself comparing the images from my Nikon D1x and this is not really > fair. > > BTW, I have used Pyro for over 6 years and find that it has no great > advantage with T-Max 100 as the staining is minimal. Now soup it with > Tri-X and you have a whole different puppy. > > Mike > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "riskdr8138" > > <L.PIRRONE@A...> wrote: > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Derek Clarke > > <derek_c@c...> > > > wrote: > > > What dpi did you scan that 4x5 at? > > > > > > On Friday 18 Jan 2002 12:44 am, Michael Kravit wrote: > > > > Jerry, > > > > > > > > I think tha visually you are seeing an image that looks like > > > > film, but in > > > > > > reality the camera would need to approach 16 megapixels to > > > > resolve the > > > > > > finest films today. > > > > > > > > For example, I recently shot an image in a Charleston Cemetary > > on > > > 4x5 T-Max > > > > > > 100. In the distance, oh perhaps 2 miles away is what looks > > like > > > a 6 story > > > > > > office building. I can zoom in on my scan and see a guy sitting > > > > at his desk > > > > > > on the top floor. > > > > can i chime in here. i have been using 4x5 for all of my photograph > > for about 10 years. when i went digital for printing (epson 1200, > > mis > > > cfs system) i aquired a heidleberg saphir ultra ii. i scan my 4x5 > > negs > > > at 1200 dpi. this gives me a 300 dpi output on at a 16x20 print > > size. > > > of course i can only print 13x19. my prints are VERY sharp. the > > heidleberg flatbed is supperb. of course you could not use it for > > 35mm, but i have made nice prints to 12x17 from 2 1/4 negs using > > genuine fractiles. > > > > i shoot large format conventional black and white and infrared. i > > develop these negs 9including the infrared in PMK which is a > > staining > > > developer. > > > > larry pirrone > > > > D30 or D1x. > > > > > > Mike > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and > other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the > subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal > attacks or "flames." - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-21 by Derek Clarke
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.