--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> wrote: > > Here's what I AM talking about- > From a purely technical standpoint, writing complex and nuanced > monochrome data to paper, more grays and/or blacks than currently > available from OEM solutions (at least the Epson K3s) are still > better. Demonstrably and significantly. Allow me to toss out a curve ball, & some related questions running through my mind lately: It's quite obvious that getting 60-70 or even 80% of maximum available quality out of any system is relatively easy. It's always that last little bit at the top that takes a disproportionate amount of effort, and it seems we on this list are primarily concerned with that area. If we could somehow 'increase the headroom' we could perhaps improve our quality without quite so much difficulty. So how in our case does one raise the ceiling of available quality? Even if you use 6, 7, or 27 shades of gray, at some point it will do no further good, because we are ignoring the most basic and fundamental limit inherent to our system: 256 shades of gray. We are stuck with translating a almost infinite palette of grays into 256 shades, and then somehow trying to reproduce that palette with equipment and software designed to print 256 shades. Remember, this system was set up many years ago by non imaging related techies who thought no one could (or more to the point NEEDED) to see more subtle gradation. OK, there were other reasons too, like processor and memory limits, etc. If there were software that could give us e.g., 512 shades of gray, and drivers that could exploit that, would that be a dramatic improvement? My feeling is that it would constitute the difference between medium format and 4x5 or even 8x10. I suppose more to the point, however: is this possible, or is it analogous to switching to hydrogen from fossil fuels? Does printing in 12 or 16 bit with drivers equipped for that come out to about the same thing, or not? Steven Karafyllakis
Message
Re: the times, they aren't a-changing-so can we start over again?
2006-11-13 by Steven Karafyllakis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.