Digital BW, The Print

Thanks for the feedback. It's consistent with what I've heard 
elswhere.  Better quality but only one tone.

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "David 
Whistance" <david.whistance@...> wrote:
>
> Hello Bcadigan
> 
> I've used the Cone NK7 inks in an Epson R800 (the smaller version 
of the
> R1800 but with the same print heads).  I've been very happy with 
its output
> which is in a completely different league to the 2100 with Bowhaus 
RIP and
> Ultrachrome inks that I used previously.  I would expect your 
improvement to
> be on a similar scale, perhaps more so due to the single black/grey 
in the
> R800/R1800.  The only drawbacks to the system are that it won't 
print on
> glossy and the tone is fixed (albeit variable with paper choice), 
however
> neither have proved to be a particular handicap to me so that I am 
now
> looking for a reasonably priced R1800 so that I can move up a size.
> 
> David Whistance
> 
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of 
bcadigan
>   Sent: 26 November 2006 19:03
>   To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>   Subject: [Digital BW] Piezography Inks with R1800 & Quadtone RIP
> 
> 
>   I am thinking of getting a set of Piezography inks for B&W 
printing on
>   my Epson 1800. Has anyone had any experience with these inks on 
that
>   printer? Specifically, did they improve your prints noticeably? 
Is it
>   as easy as they claim to move back and forth between the 
Piezography
>   cartridges for B&W and the Epson cartridges for clor printing? So 
far
>   Quadtone RIP is giving me pretty good results in B&W with the 
regular
>   set of Epson inks.
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>