True, there are benefits, but what about any drawbacks? Do you suggest that color-ICC is now working wonderfully, and there is no reason to continue with "traditional" printing methods that reduce use of color inks, precisely manage luminance, etc. How many points, for each possible 2d slice is needed to implement a good 3d workflow, vs. how many is practical with our current tools? John -----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of CDTobie@... Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 9:31 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Grayscale Vs Color (was PFP with UT7) In a message dated 11/30/06 11:03:12 PM, cj@... <mailto:cj%40cjcom.net> writes: > I think this last exchange has been an important one: > Perhaps, but it, and the other "traditionalist" responses to it seem to miss the point that a color workflow supports all that and more. If you only want to use fixed, 2d slices out of a 3d process, that works great. You simply aren't limited to that. C. David Tobie Product Technology Manager ColorVision Business Unit Datacolor Inc. CDTobie@... <mailto:CDTobie%40colorvision.com> www.colorvision.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Grayscale Vs Color (was PFP with UT7)
2006-12-01 by John Moody
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.