--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "neilsphoto" <neilsphoto@...> wrote: > I print on the 2200 using Cone NK7 inks. They can sit for quite a while and still print. These inks have never clogged my printer. QTR supplies many profiles for the Cone inks. You won't have a problem finding several papers you like that have been profiled. QTR with OEM inks work well, but color inks have different fade properties than a straight Black and White set. QTR is cheap compared with anything else out there! You can't go wrong using it! Steve > OK so this is a question, well maybe several about QTR and various > inksets. I've done searchs here but this is maybe more basic than the > topics and threads I found. > > I print with a 2200, print from digital caputure and scanned negs and > am pretty much happy with BO and UT7 printing on mostly matt papers. > I am not one to make my own profiles. I barely have time to print at > all it seems. > > So why be interested in QTR? Well there is my question so here goes. > > Reading front the QTR website I should be able to ......... > > 1. Print with OE 2200 inks and make B&Ws w/o meteramism (sp) and > adjust print tone on the papers I use with QTR profiles. OE inks > never fail me whether I print every day or once a month, they always work. > > 2. Do the same as above with UT7s from MIS. UT7s don't like to sit > idle, really don't like to sit idle unistalled while I have OEs in the > printer. > > Still do BO prints when I want w/o changing a thing. > > Use the new Cone Neutral/warm/Split 7 ink sets. I've never used Cone > products. I went with BO early on when the 2200 out of the box didn't > give me the B&W I wanted. I'd heard/read that Cones clogged and had > other problems. I wanted none of that. Has that changed? Keep in > mind sometimes I don't print for a month. > > So am I correct in the above? QTR would do all that? Give me all > those options? > > Then again it sounds as if maybe a new 3800 would do all of the above > including maybe BO with nothing but OE inks. > > So I'd like to get some opinions on how well QTR works with what I > described above. I just never considered it before as I need to keep > it simple and reliable so when I get time it all works w/o clogs etc. > > Thanks ahead of time > > Neil >
Message
Re: QTR 101
2006-12-04 by steveh0607
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.