Marco, >I start to use UT-3d with my 2100 about 3 months ago. ... >... I want to try some different papers. >... >1 - I can use a curve to linearizing a print ramp from > black to white (using a good scanner or a densitometer/ spectro). >But how can I control the tone of my print? See http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/Embedding_Photoshop_Curves_in_ICCs.pdf The tone curve is used to print the 21-step curve and is also dropped into the ICC along with the Lab L readings. I've posted not only the ICCs but also the tone curve at http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/UT-3D_Downloads.html The tone curves that I've posted will probably be close enough for many papers. If not, then find the one that is closest, and use it as a starting point to make a one for the new paper. >2 - which difference if I use only the L value or > all the L+a+b value? The 3D inkset makes a reasonably neutral tone when no curve is used, but you'll usually be better off with an RGB curve embedded in the ICC along with the Lab L numbers. >3 - with the new printfix pro 2.0 is possible to create > profile directly also for a UT-3D set? Yes. PFP 2.0 will make a neutral ICC. With that neutral ICC you still have some control of tone by using that ICC for soft proofing and then using Color Balance of other tools in Photoshop to alter the RGB values. The color balance controls will not be labeled correctly due to the 3D's "twisted" color space, but the soft proofing on the monitor works. The range of tones you can bet with this approach is less than will curves, but it's easier. Keep an eye on the 21-step ramp smoothness. When you go too far with the color balance controls the ramp will become visibly distorted. > Is a good solution or I can do better with QTR create ICC? It's a question of how appropriate the existing tone curve is for the new paper you're interested in and how comfortable you are with the various approaches. It's good to have multiple workflows available. >4 - the printfix pro 2.0 will work also with the old printfix > or only with the printfix pro? C. David will have to answer this one. Good luck with your system. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] UT-3D and profile for 2100
2006-12-10 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.