You can almost feel their hand in your pocket. I just ran a 3800 manual nozzle check; my last print was 48 hours ago. It reported 7.2ml used by running a cleaning before proceeding with the nozzle check. Amazing, you can't even decide if a cleaning is needed first, it just does it... The check was good . very big grin. Just to be clear, I'm not whining, I anticipated the ink cleanings would be much more aggressive than a 2400; not happy about it, but not unexpected. Best regards, John Moody -----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Paul Roark Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 4:45 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re: Dmax of Claria inks >Some would ask why use Claria at all? >... not any better than K3. >... high ink cost, > tamper-resistant cartridge ... It looks like Epson is building a fortress around this printer to stop 3rd party inks. Until someone busts their system, like with an empty cart that avoids the patents, I would totally avoid R260 and other Claria printers. If these printers are tied to overpriced inks, their initial purchase price is, in effect, just the down payment for a much more expensive system. Tying agreements used to be illegal, but no more. Caveat Emptor. This same view applies to all printers that effectively tie the printer to aftermarket sales. I hope the 3800 carts cab be refilled easily. If they can, we can do just fine with bulk inks. I refill large format printer carts all the time. I have not analyzed to the Epson patent protections suits to know if there are any desktop machines they are leaving open to the B&W. I'll ask Epson. Paul www.PaulRoark.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Dmax of Claria inks
2006-12-11 by John Moody
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.