I decided to throw my Canon IPF5000 into the mix. It came out a distant third for two reasons: 1) There is a bit of graininess which IS visible to the naked eye (you have to look close, but it is definitely there. Don't know yet whether this is due to the nature of the Canon printer, or something isn't right with my print head. The latter is a definite possibility, because I have seen some very odd looking numbers for the auto head alignment. Tech support assured me that it was OK, but now I am not so sure, since I see an actual anomaly. 2) While the Canon prints are indeed "dead neutral" by measurement, the monochrome photo mode apparently doesn't track to paper white. Example of L*a*b* values measured with Eye One Spectro: Paper - Innova Cold Press (beautiful and fairly inexpensive paper, by the way) Innova Paper White - 97.4, -0.1, 2.4 Cone Neutral K7 print through QTR - 66.9, 0.6, 2.3 Canon print with 10, -2 setting - 70.1, 0.1, 0.4 Ignoring the difference in luminosity, which can easily be tweaked, the main difference here is that by L* approximately 70 the NK7 print tracks the paper white almost exactly (b* 2.4, slightly yellow), while the Canon print is "technically" correct at b* of very close to 0 (0.4). The Canon print doesn't look right visually to me. Not sure if I would call this a bug, but it is less than ideal in my opinion. One way around it would be to pick a paper which has paper white of very close to 0 on the b* axis. I think I measured Museo or Museo Max as fitting this criteria. PS The Epson ABW mode also tracks to paper white the way the NK7 inkset does with QTR. Comments? --John
Message
Re: Comparison of Ultrachrome K3 Advanced B&W and Cone Neutral K7 Inks
2007-01-14 by John Hollenberg
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.