Digital BW, The Print

Hi There,

EPSG has no optical brighteners and has a smoother surface (not as 
stipply or star like when seen with glancing light). EPL has optical 
brighteners and has a grittier surface. I prefer the EPSG because the 
surface is less obtrusive and there are no optical brighteners to 
fade. It is my favorite paper and I use it for both color and B&W. It 
dry mounts very well and has a wonderful d-max. I hope that helps you.

http://www.scottjonesphoto.com

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Andy-J 
<andyj1011@...> wrote:
>
> I could sear that I have seen this question asked and answered, but 
cannot
> find it.
> 
> What is the essential difference between these two papers (using K3 
inks)?
> I've had both, but not at the same time.  I seem to recall that 
semigloss
> is a little thicker, perhaps?  But not seeing them side by side, my
> perception of the two is that they are the same.  --except it seems 
there
> are more choices for packaging in the luster - 20, 50, 100, 250 
sheet packs,
> etc.
> 
> Can anyone give me a quickie comparison?
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>