Digital BW, The Print

Metamerism.  The print looked greenish-blue.  Previously, under
tungsten, daylight, even fluorescent, I had seen this print as pretty
neutral.  The gallery owner and her assistant looked at it.  The
assistant told me not to worry; that this was a common problem for
inkjet prints.  I was pretty embarrassed.

Ed


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Gledhill
<stephengledhill@...> wrote:
>
> In what way was it simply awful?
> Steve Gledhill
> http://www.virtuallygrey.co.uk/
> 
> edrudolpho wrote:
> >
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
> > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>, Steve
Gledhill
> > <stephengledhill@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Can only speak for myself - obviously.
> > >
> > > It's a superb paper and I use it extensively. Particularly for large
> > > prints on my 4800 - with K3 inks, and ABW and QTR-Create-ICC.
> > > Why? Deep blacks. Warmish creamyish paper colour which I
particularly
> > > like for my work.
> >
> > This is exactly the workflow I was using (except on a 2400). Until
> > one day I walked into a gallery with a SilverRag ABW-K3-QTRIcc-printed
> > print. The print looked simply awful under their lighting. I lost
> > faith in the all-Epson ABW approach and ordered some MIS EZWarm to
> > replace the yellow ink and rejiggered my ABW settings. I haven't been
> > back to the gallery yet.
> >
> > Ed
> >
> 
> 	
> 	
> 		
> ___________________________________________________________ 
> All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity
and ease of use." - PC Magazine 
> http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
>