Digital BW, The Print

Actually, I was surprised at the question also. I am in law enforcement, do evidence and accident photography. I have never heard of this film and outside of the quickie glovebox point and shoots, digital is overtaking film at a rapid pace. There are still some arguments being made regarding manipulation of photos and what is considered permissible.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: flyflightdeck 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 1:48 PM
  Subject: [SPAM] [Digital BW] Re: slightly OT: disappointment with Bluefire Police film


  Who uses film anymore ;)

  --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "David Keenan"
  <ausdlk@...> wrote:
  >
  > I just developed my two trial rolls of Bluefire Police film.
  > 
  > Overall they are both very thin. Some frames so thin that I fear
  whether I
  > can pull a satisfactory scans from them.
  > 
  > Both rolls were exposed at ISO 80 and developed using the
  low-contrast 16
  > minute development method in the developer provided.
  > 
  > Maybe the thin film is a result of the low-agitation/low-contrast
  > development because I am confident that my metering was done
  correctly. But
  > I have no point of reference about this.
  > 
  > Anyone else have experience with this film?
  > 
  > Dave.
  > -- 
  > Web Site: www.david-keenan.com
  > 2007 PAW: www.david-keenan.com/paw
  > 2006 EuroBlog: www.david-keenan.com/euroblog
  > 
  > 
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]