Digital BW, The Print

this doesn't even sound like the same paper. The Innova F-type gloss I've used no doubt 
also glowingly reported on here. It's certainly not warm, much less gloss differential them 
Premium Luster, and bears no resemblence to my memory of cheap Epson gloss or any 
other papers for that matter...
Aside from appearances it definitely does not feel cheap, but thick and substantial.
All this stuff is subjective and we will not all like the same materials, sorry you didn't like 
it.
But it almost sounds like the wrong paper...
Tyler

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Douglas meeuwsen 
<lipshurt@...> wrote:
>
> got my box of innova  f-type glossy today. I guess I was expecting  
> more.....
> On the epson 2400, i would describe it as:
> 
> The look and feel of cheap epson glossy paper, with all of the gloss  
> differential of epson premium luster. This paper does not impress me.  
> The image quality is great, and the warmish tone is great too, but  
> the gloss diffential and bronzing are exactly the same as the epson  
> papers, which are about half the price.
> 
> I wonder if the innova semi-matte has these problems. I read glowing  
> reports the f-type gloss, but as far as I can see, there is nothing  
> new here. Even the surface has been around for years as cheap epson  
> glossy. I would say that epson premium semi gloss and semi-matte are  
> both superior on the 2400. The epson ultra premium glossy is better  
> too. Oh well, live and learn. Doug M
>