In a message dated 1/30/07 1:27:20 PM, evogel@... writes: > Thanks David. Wasn't really suggesting (cold) north light as a good source > for these purposes, but it is significant historically. > Yes, and quite interesting in terms of interpreting color intent in historic paintings. It has a factor more directly related to this list as well: papers with artificial brighteners may look quite similar to non-brightened papers in lights low in UV and low in blue (such as tungten and other incandescents); but the same papers compared under north light look REALLY different, due to increased blue light (and if the glazing isn't UV resistant, from increased UV components exciting the brighteners as well). This factor is often confused with illuminant metamerism; but its not actually related. So I tend to note "illuminant metamerism and OBA excitation" as a pair of factors, but no one seems to 'get' the second one, so perhaps we need a more easily understood name for it... C. David Tobie Product Technology Manager ColorVision Business Unit Datacolor Inc. CDTobie@... www.colorvision.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by CDTobie@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.