> > It uses a parallel port dongle, and they're coming out with a USB dongle > version for the Macs. > Wow... I can't imagine more than 10 people buying software that requires a dingle... This is like going back to the earliest versions of Lotus 1-2-3. Equally hard to see a parallel port version of anything selling well. I guess Jon Cone has just licensed a version of Image Print...I only hope he didn't put a lot of development time and/or money into it because this sounds like a loser...and I think that even if the quality is significantly better. This is just not a concept that is going to be received well by many people (IMHO). I have been thinking about ditching my 1160s and upgrading to 1280s or 5000s, thinking this new software would be the impetus for me...now I'd better find another 1160<g>. What a disappointment. I usually get incredibly excited about even fairly minor improvements in tools I use so much. Hard to understand how they could be this far off (at least from my point of view...maybe I'm isolated, but I suspect not.). Tom O'Connell TomOC@... www.thomasoconnell.com
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Piezo2 vs ImagePrint RIPS? Mike K.?
2002-01-25 by tomoc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.