djon43 wrote: > Harman asserts they're alone with baryta. > > Is some clay other than baryta used? > > Baryta's only advantage vs other clays(the reason Kodak used it for > Kodabromide)was its natural whiteness. It was called "pipeclay" in the > Royal Marines of the 18th century, used to whiten uniforms (just a tidbit) > > The "fineness" would be irrelevant, since it's ground to whatever > degree is necessary. I wouldn't call Barium Sulphate/Sulfate a clay. It isn't pipe clay. It is more an ore. Barium Sulfate should be called Barite or Baryte and not Baryta which is Barium Hydroxide. The last you wouldn't like to use as a coating as it is a strong base and water soluble. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryta http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barite http://www.sharlot.org/archives/photographs/19th/book/chapter_2.html The last link describes the use of Barite as a whitener for paper since the 1820's and as a whitener for photographic paper since1880. Some of us have swallowed it mixed in water before x-ray takes in hospital, it increases contrasts. One wonders whether that Harman name is used as a reference to the Harman Barite mine in Virginia. http://www.mindat.org/loc.php?loc=104721&ob=4 The usual clay as used in offset paper coatings is kaolin which may be used in one form or another in inkjet coatings too. The fineness can be very relevant if the crystal structure + the stacking of the particles defines the absorption of fluids. That kaolin or China clay or pipe clay is the base for porcelain as well and used by soldiers too for cleaning and whitening. Kaolinite is a kind of aluminium silicate, the particle structure and stacking of particles is important in the absorption behaviour so there are different methods for manufacturing the coating powder. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaolin There's a difference in use too in inkjet papers I guess. The Barite is there in the first place as whitener + to make the paper more opaque, the clays like Kaolin are there to absorb the ink and by that reduce bleeding next to being (less) white and opaque. Harman refers to a silica coating as well on that paper. The Barite was used in analogue papers before RC papers, as a first coating on paper to get the white surface and on top of that the silver gelatine emulsion, in inkjet papers that would be the ink receptive layer of micro ceramics/silica/kaolin or whatever on top. The extended tone range if there is any is probably achieved at the paper white end if it is the result of the Barite. Overall the coating could have been improved next to the Barite addition. Whether that Barite is so special has to be seen, titan dioxide has been used for decades as a whitener for RC and normal papers and does a good job, opacity being better. Innova's Fibaprint uses titan dioxyde. Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Micro Ceramic Lustre Vs (presumably) Harman
2007-02-27 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.