Thanks Tom. What advantages did you find Vs QTR with CS2 (my normal practice)? Is Qimage>QTR mostly a way to avoid post processing in CS? Do you think it makes more sense for "conventional" images, such as journalism or weddings or generic scenics than for more intense "art" images in which each individual shot calls for careful manipulation? John --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Husband" <tom.husband@...> wrote: > > Yes, I think so. I use it all the time and am very pleased with the > results. I'll use it to print directly to the printer with the 2400 ABW or > a PFP made profile. I'll also use its "Print to File" feature and then > print through QTR. When I had my 2200/UT7 setup I'd used Qimage along with > QTR Create ICC RGB profiles (Qimage won't print grayscale). The Qimage > Smart Sharpening and interpolation can't be beat. > > Tom Husband > > On 3/6/07, djon43 <djon43@...> wrote: > > > > I've recently seen some fine B&W prints, 2200/UT7, made using Qimage. > > > > Question for users: Is it practical/good for routine single- enlargement > > use in common smaller sizes, such as letter and 13X19? > > > > I'm rusty with Qimage...have not used it for two years...back then I > > used it for multi-image, cards, "contact sheets" (and the > > interpolations beat Genuine Fractals). > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Your thoughts: routine use of Qimage?
2007-03-06 by djon43
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.