Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] "Generations" Inks

2007-03-07 by Steve

As always, the subject is too complex for my simple questioning.
My color use will be almost exclusively for digital negatives on 
pictorico overhead transparancy paper.
I guess I was just looking for general "Yes it works well, or, No 
it's complete crap" sort of feedback.
It's moot now.  I've gone ahead and taken the plunge...

Thanks,


> Compare in what way?  To which inkset- dye or pigments?  On what 
type  
> of paper?  Are you concerned with image quality or image 
longevity?   
> If you print on glossy paper and are not concerned with image  
> longevity, there is no reason to switch from Epson apart from cost 
or  
> wanting to use bulk inks.  If you're concerned with archivalness,  
> pigments will be much better, but will not print well on glossy  
> surfaces. This may have improved with some recent papers 
somewhat.   
> There will be a narrower gamut with pigments, but when I switched 
to  
> Generations years ago, for image longevity reasons,  I was 
pleasantly  
> surprised at how well they printed- on matte papers.  There is  
> nothing magical about Generations or any other inkset (and some 
have  
> been a disaster for some of us) speaking generally.  Until you have 
a  
> specific reason to switch to another set, I'd say stick with what 
you  
> have. Epson inks will give you the best image quality and there 
will  
> be things like profiles available for them that will not be as  
> available with a third party inkset until you are ready to create  
> your own.
> 
> James Irelan
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.