As always, the subject is too complex for my simple questioning. My color use will be almost exclusively for digital negatives on pictorico overhead transparancy paper. I guess I was just looking for general "Yes it works well, or, No it's complete crap" sort of feedback. It's moot now. I've gone ahead and taken the plunge... Thanks, > Compare in what way? To which inkset- dye or pigments? On what type > of paper? Are you concerned with image quality or image longevity? > If you print on glossy paper and are not concerned with image > longevity, there is no reason to switch from Epson apart from cost or > wanting to use bulk inks. If you're concerned with archivalness, > pigments will be much better, but will not print well on glossy > surfaces. This may have improved with some recent papers somewhat. > There will be a narrower gamut with pigments, but when I switched to > Generations years ago, for image longevity reasons, I was pleasantly > surprised at how well they printed- on matte papers. There is > nothing magical about Generations or any other inkset (and some have > been a disaster for some of us) speaking generally. Until you have a > specific reason to switch to another set, I'd say stick with what you > have. Epson inks will give you the best image quality and there will > be things like profiles available for them that will not be as > available with a third party inkset until you are ready to create > your own. > > James Irelan > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] "Generations" Inks
2007-03-07 by Steve
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.