As always, the subject is too complex for my simple questioning.
My color use will be almost exclusively for digital negatives on
pictorico overhead transparancy paper.
I guess I was just looking for general "Yes it works well, or, No
it's complete crap" sort of feedback.
It's moot now. I've gone ahead and taken the plunge...
Thanks,
> Compare in what way? To which inkset- dye or pigments? On what
type
> of paper? Are you concerned with image quality or image
longevity?
> If you print on glossy paper and are not concerned with image
> longevity, there is no reason to switch from Epson apart from cost
or
> wanting to use bulk inks. If you're concerned with archivalness,
> pigments will be much better, but will not print well on glossy
> surfaces. This may have improved with some recent papers
somewhat.
> There will be a narrower gamut with pigments, but when I switched
to
> Generations years ago, for image longevity reasons, I was
pleasantly
> surprised at how well they printed- on matte papers. There is
> nothing magical about Generations or any other inkset (and some
have
> been a disaster for some of us) speaking generally. Until you have
a
> specific reason to switch to another set, I'd say stick with what
you
> have. Epson inks will give you the best image quality and there
will
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> be things like profiles available for them that will not be as
> available with a third party inkset until you are ready to create
> your own.
>
> James Irelan
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>