As the result of recent experiences, I am curious if anyone uses the ProPhotoRGB colorspace in photoshop when correcting/printing photos. I had some photos I wanted to correct into B&W, and someone suggested trying the prophotoRGB instead of my usual adobeRGB. The expanded space was of course beautiful and seemed to capture subtle highlights much better (at least on the histogram: I only have an 8-bit monitor so I'm sure I'm not seeing everything). I went to print on my Epson 2400 with UT3D inkset, and found that much of my nuances and subtleties were completely lost on the printed output (using museo sr paper). I expected some of this, since the printer is a much lower resolution device. It took some effort to essentialy compress the colorspace into something the printer could better output, and at the end of it I thought I would have been better off just sticking with AdobeRGB colorspace, which is already smaller and has a shorter path to get to printed output. musings include: - do folks use prophotoRGB colorspace in general? - If so, how do you think about/manage output to lower res devices? - If it creates more headaches than not, is it even worth considering for bw desktop output?
Message
Musings on ProPhotoRGB colorspace
2007-03-20 by bvalente
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.