> Does anyone have experience with the following Epson models in b&w > printing? > > R800 > > 1200 > > 1800 > > Also, if you have found a good, reliable place to buy one, please let > me know. Any and all comments greatly appreciated. > > Alan > Alan, As an owner of a 1280 (I assume that's what you meant when you said "1200"), I would get the 1800 instead. Not because the 1280 is a bad printer, but because there are now easier, more reliably printers available. The 1280 does a beautiful job on B&W prints when you use a third party ink set such as the pigment UT-2 inks designed by Paul and sold by MIS. However, the 1280 is an older design dye-based printer and as such requires more maintenance to keep it working properly. If you use pigment inks in a 1280, you must print at least once a week or you will have clogging problems, whereas the 1800 and 2400 are designed from the beginning to pump pigment-based printers and are not as prone to clog if they sit for a while. Besides, like Paul said, $300 for a refirb'ed 1800 is going to be hard to beat!
Message
Re: Epson printers pro & con
2007-03-30 by Bob Marsolais
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.