Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Epson printers pro & con

2007-03-30 by Bob Marsolais

> Does anyone have experience with the following Epson models in b&w 
> printing?
> 
> R800
> 
> 1200
> 
> 1800
> 
> Also, if you have found a good, reliable place to buy one, please let 
> me know. Any and all comments greatly appreciated.
> 
> Alan
>
Alan,

As an owner of a 1280 (I assume that's what you meant when you said
"1200"), I would get the 1800 instead.  Not because the 1280 is a bad
printer, but because there are now easier, more reliably printers
available.  The 1280 does a beautiful job on B&W prints when you use a
third party ink set such as the pigment UT-2 inks designed by Paul and
sold by MIS.  However, the 1280 is an older design dye-based printer
and as such requires more maintenance to keep it working properly.  If
you use pigment inks in a 1280, you must print at least once a week or
you will have clogging problems, whereas the 1800 and 2400 are
designed from the beginning to pump pigment-based printers and are not
as prone to clog if they sit for a while.

Besides, like Paul said, $300 for a refirb'ed 1800 is going to be hard
to beat!

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.