djon43 wrote: > HP makes a point about marketing hype that neglects lignin factor, and > here's Breathingcolor.com on hype that pushes cotton Vs > alpha-cellulose. Should especially concern people who use Wilhelm lore > to market their prints: > I'm not picking on anyone here, least of all djon43. Let that be said. But I have to ask the group members who are harping on alpha cellulose some questions: are you the same people who have been begging for inkjet papers that replicate that air-dried F surface darkroom paper look? And have you been begging for it to be less expensive? And are you aware that all the excellent darkroom papers of the 20th century were alpha cellulose? Those old Adams, Weston, et al prints that everyone loves so much on Kodak, Ilford, Agfa, etc. papers are alpha cellulose, not cotton rag. They seem to be holding up rather well. And they certainly seem to be holding their value. I for one would love to see more alpha cellulose papers on the market. -- Bruce Watson
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Marketing hype for cotton.
2007-04-06 by Bruce Watson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.