Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Suggestions for Negative Scanner

2007-04-12 by Ernst Dinkla

David Keenan wrote:
>> Vuescan is better for me
> 
> I have no doubt that VS is capable of making excellent scans.
> 
> I have tried to use it recently with an Epson V750 to scan medium format
> 6x4.5 negatives with the betterscanning.com dual MF film holder.
> 
> Getting VS to create and maintain predictable framing of two strips of four
> frames using this holder was incredibly complex and convoluted.
> Took oountess hours to figure out how to do it and even then each new scan
> cycle requires more messing around to get the frames to align again.
> 
> The documentation in this regard is useless.
> 
> Maybe my distaste for VS comes from trying to use it for something other
> than vanilla 35mm scans using the stock Epson holders.
> 
> But in this day and age not being able to grab a marquee around a frame to
> resize and move it (something EpsonScan can do) is down right ridiculous.
> 
> If I am missing something related to easier scanning with VS then I stand
> ready to be corrected -- so please let me know...
> 
> Dave.
> 
Read the manual as someone suggested. The framing + crop 
isn't the most user friendly aspect of Vuescan but it has 
many features including a changeable border where no light 
measurement is done and more like that.

The suggestion that it only works with the OEM holders isn't 
true, I couldn't have done all the wet mounting methods I 
developed for the Nikon 8000 and the Epson Perfection models 
years ago if Vuescan was limited to the OEM holders windows.

Met vriendelijke groeten,  Ernst


|  Dinkla Grafische Techniek  |
|     www.pigment-print.com    |
|             ( unvollendet )            |

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.