David Keenan wrote: >> Vuescan is better for me > > I have no doubt that VS is capable of making excellent scans. > > I have tried to use it recently with an Epson V750 to scan medium format > 6x4.5 negatives with the betterscanning.com dual MF film holder. > > Getting VS to create and maintain predictable framing of two strips of four > frames using this holder was incredibly complex and convoluted. > Took oountess hours to figure out how to do it and even then each new scan > cycle requires more messing around to get the frames to align again. > > The documentation in this regard is useless. > > Maybe my distaste for VS comes from trying to use it for something other > than vanilla 35mm scans using the stock Epson holders. > > But in this day and age not being able to grab a marquee around a frame to > resize and move it (something EpsonScan can do) is down right ridiculous. > > If I am missing something related to easier scanning with VS then I stand > ready to be corrected -- so please let me know... > > Dave. > Read the manual as someone suggested. The framing + crop isn't the most user friendly aspect of Vuescan but it has many features including a changeable border where no light measurement is done and more like that. The suggestion that it only works with the OEM holders isn't true, I couldn't have done all the wet mounting methods I developed for the Nikon 8000 and the Epson Perfection models years ago if Vuescan was limited to the OEM holders windows. Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Suggestions for Negative Scanner
2007-04-12 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.