I've seen fine examples in B&W print exchanges and, although I understand why some love them, I don't. They "glitter" a little, which isn't bad in itself but I think it defeats the air-dried-glossy effort. On the other hand, examples of Hahnemuele (sp?) Photo Rag have been attractive enough that I might order some, next time I'm feeling spendy. The most appealing new-to-me paper is Epson Velvet Fine Art, which looks a lot like Kodak's best B&W paper ever, whose name I don't remember except that it involved "portrait". Kodak's was good enough that I used it sometimes instead of Brovira :-) I'd use this paper for portraits, for sure, but don't think its character would contribute to my other goals...though maybe it'd remind someone of Portriga Rapid. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Tom Baker <tbaker1328@...> wrote: > > Purely subjective, but after buying a couple rolls of the SR, I went back to the mat papers. Even though the SR has a higher dMax, it doesn't look as 'rich' to me. > > Tom Baker > > Evan Wolarsky <wolarsky@...> wrote: > Just curious as to whether many people have found a use for the newer > Silver Rag type papers, as opposed to sticking with the traditional > matte papers? > > Evan > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Matte Papers vs. newer Silver Rag type papers
2007-04-13 by djon43
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.