Only problem is you can't use a color managed printing workflow yet (eg. can't use Create-icc profiles for printing) with Lightroom and QTR. There seems to be a bug in Lightroom and/or OS X that is producing this problem. Roy was looking into this problem before I left a few weeks ago for vacation, but I don't know if he has found any solution uet. Carl Schofield On Apr 15, 2007, at 11:26 PM, Walker Blackwell wrote: > Hey everyone. I've been busy in the last few days exploring the > wonders of Lightroom v1 in conjunction with the newest QTR for OS X. I > must say, the two apps work together wonderfully. Because Lightroom > runs both processors to the max (I've seen it running at 192% in > Activity Viewer with my duel G5) a 30x40 rips in under a minute. Then > it takes about another minute (or less) to copy into queue and then > boom, it's printing. This applies for all images, color and grayscale. > As a StudioPrint user, this "little" app is just blowing every other > tiling software's pants off. I see only three problems right off > the bat: > > 1. The software doesn't let you do per image resizing very well (you > get tiling but they all have to be similar in size). 2. It has a max > file size of 10,000 pixels on the longest side. (I figure Adobe will > fix this soon.) 3. You set your print size based upon the image > margins. In other-words. this program is pixel-based. The meta-data > for the image-size (ala Photoshop) is not used. So you have to know > what size you're printing the image to begin with. For normal users > that is fine. But as a print lab, I have to open the images in > Photoshop in order to see the print-size that the customer wanted if > they are communicating that way. Small but significant. > > But aside from that, the goods out-way the bads. Non-destructive image > editing. Full database support that auto-updates to the OS X folder > system. ProPhoto working space. Very comprehensive print templates > that can be saved and migrated to different machines very easily. It's > FAST. Auto updates from Adobe. It costs less than $300.00. It can span > multiple hard-drives (when a hard-drive is off-line the gallery just > shows red but gives you your thumbnails). It does all the hunky-dory > wedding stuff (output to Flash and HTML and Websites, etc etc). > > So now that I have a tiling application that can rip an image with > 100% of my computer's power, it makes QTR all that more appealing. The > other reason? Because I can do split toning with my SL and WN Quad > printer in 1% increments + split those tones differently in the > shadows mid-tones and highlights. This is something StudioPrint hasn't > even approached. > > Just wanted to share this with you. In the last few days this > application pretty much took over my entire work-flow for prints 30x40 > inches on down. > > I'd be interested in the Aperture side of things as well if anyone's > using that on this board. I stopped experimenting with that program > because it was so slow. > > take care all, > Walker Blackwell > > Black Point Editions, Ltd. > 1932 S Halsted St, Ste 504, > Chicago, IL 60608 > 312.491.8051 > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Lightroom and QTR Review
2007-04-16 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.