Antonis, ---- Original Message ----- From: antonisphoto To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 12:31 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Piezo2 vs ImagePrint RIPS? Mike K.? Mike, while you were "away", I posted a report on ImagePrint in message 8371. Any further comments? <Response> Yes, I read it and think you did an excellent job. I find the tones a bit smoother and the blacks more dense. The dither pattern is a bit different, but visually (w/o a loupe) one can not see the dither. Are the Lyson profiles you mention for RGB or grayscale files (on their way to hex-black)? I assume these are provided by Colorbyte as part of IP4. <Response> Interesting question. I used them for grayscale quads and they work beautifully. And, of course, you make a very good point. If you follow these lists you'd think nobody ever has time to take a single picture. We all seem buried in the minutiae of tech talk. But photography - wet or otherwise - has always been the point where art meets esoteric tech tips and tricks. With a particularly fast moving target like digital, we can barely afford to peacefully set-it-and-forget-it. But I, for one, have enjoyed some of that peace for a year now of "straight" piezo on 1160. Costly, imperfect (in its end-user controls), not without problems, but, man, so rewarding in the prints I have made. Of course, one has to forget the subtleties available in such silver prints as Michael Kenna's. It may be a while before we get there digitally. And, yes, I have seen his prints up close and had the same reaction as you. <Response> I prints are amazing. I even briefly conmsidered building my darkroom again.....ever so briefly, and them remembered that my idea of fun is not spending the whole day in the dark. Mike [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Piezo2 vs ImagePrint RIPS? Mike K.?
2002-01-28 by Michael Kravit
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.