Hello Amadou, >A couple of years ago I tried some sheets of the PremiereArt Hot >Press, and while the Dmax with the Cone inks was relatively low, >their coating held a very very tight dot, providing excellent image >sharpness. The Innova papers hold a tight dot as well, compared to >the Hahnemühle lineup. I find that on images with lots of fine >detail and selective focus a tighter dot can give a greater sense of >depth or dimensionality. I'm always amazed how different papers can be in this impression of depth. VFA is outstanding in this regard. VFA also has some texture and is not a hard surface, but somehow manages to retain very fine detail. It's biggest problem is a tendency to flake (and it's expensive). I put up with it because it's so good looking and nothing else (that I've tried so far) beats it visually (with K3). I tried PA Hot Press when I was using primarily MIS inks and was impressed with everything except dmax. If it wasn't for that I would have used it. I haven't tried it with K3 ink, I guess because I haven't heard that it's any better and don't want to spend money to find out. So I was really surprised by the dmax of MBW. I wish whatever is producing the dmax there could be transferred to a warmer paper. If Hot Press had that dmax....now that would be a winner. I still have hope that my dream matte paper will arrive some day: the beauty and feel of VFA with the dmax of SR and physical durability and non-flakiness of Museo Max. I'm not asking too much am I? Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Matte BW vs Kayenta for K3
2007-04-24 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.