Paul, The Epson 4000 driver dither is already quite good with just single channel BO so it might be a good candidate for multiple Eboni channels. Does the GRAY_OVERLAP function in QTR help at all with smoothing out the banding artifacts in the 1800? Carl On May 8, 2007, at 3:05 PM, Paul Roark wrote: > Hi Carl, > >> Sounds like a promising approach. > > I really like the idea of no color pigments, and the tones I'm > getting on > Premier Art 325 (no OBAs) is just a bit warm, but looks fine to me. > > I'm now printing with QTR and 3 jets. It may be enough to reduce the > typical one-jet banding sufficiently. If so, it would allow the > 1800 to be > a full Epson driver color printer as well as a pure carbon QTR > printer if > only matte paper was used. > >> Did you try this with any of the 3.5 pl printers > > Not yet. The single channel 3.5 pl BO is a bit rough, but it is > worth a try > on one of them also. > >> ... do the "1.5 pl" printers only use the smallest dot size >> in the highlights (assuming they use some kind of variable >> dot size approach) or is this >> controlled by driver resolution settings? > > I'm not sure. I've been using the highest resolution so far, > assuming that > is going to be needed. The 1800 is fast enough that the high > resolution > settings are fine. > > With QTR (and maybe even with the Epson driver) it may be that > staggering > the curves is needed to control some artifacts. The Gimp ordered > dither is > not particularly good with this setup when all are on the same > curve. Once > the curves are varied, the "ordered" nature of the pattern is more > scattered. The highlights still seem a bit too ordered, but I'm > not sure > anyone can see that without a loupe. > > It's still early in this experimenting, and unfortunately, I'm at a > disadvantage due to these defective refurbs. The C,M & Y jets are > working > on this one, so I'm a bit more able to see what a good printer will > look > like. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] R800-1800 pure carbon printing
2007-05-08 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.