Yes, I use UT7 with 2200 and have to unclog between uses, even if only after a day. That's an expense I accept because I like the looks of UT7. I don't know if that's typically 20% but it surely is sometimes, when multiple unclogs are necessary...which means each cart costs an extra $2-3 if one compares to OEM. From the beginning I knew/believed clogs were certain with MIS and every none-OEM, and I've not seen any credible report to the contrary. I've had a grand total of one clog with OEM in that machine in several years. Is Piezo any less clog-prone? I can't think why it would be and I'm not interested in experimentation. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Richard Smallfield <r.smallfield@...> wrote: > > Hello, > having installed my first MIS cartridges in years, I've used up 20% of the ink just trying to get a good nozzle check on my 2100. more than enough to offset any price advantage, at least with prefilled carts. Maybe with a CFS it would still be worth it for me, but I haven't the time to spend just getting the nozzles to work. > > This never happens with OEM inks and is the reason why I gave up on UT inks years ago. > > The idea of using MIS inks appeals, but I can't see myself changing over again with this sort of performance. > > Richard > -- > http://smallfield.vze.com > http://photos.smallfield.vze.com (Photos web site) > http://warkworth.vze.com/ (Warkworth photo essay) > http://picasaweb.google.com/rsmallfield/ (Recent work) > > "Whatever you can do, or dream you can, begin it. > Boldness has genius, power and magic in it. > Begin it now." > --Goethe >
Message
Re: MIS & Ink flow
2007-05-12 by djon43
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.