John, Maybe I¹ve missed your point. If so, I apologize. But I looked at these images and saw beautiful shots. Is one the derivative of another? Perhaps. But then there also were ³schools² such as Impressionist, Cubist, Paris, etc. with certain similarities among the works of different artists. Are you suggesting that photographers, individually, own a style? That I can¹t capture someone jumping over a puddle? Harry On 5/25/07 2:55 PM, "john dean" <deanwork2003@...> wrote: > Damn, these days with Google you can't get away with that crap. He's > even stolen the entire subject matter AND the aesthetic. Architects > are smart and know how to hustle the public and make a buck. I'd > better shut up, I might having to print for the sucker some day. Na. > Compare these three web pages. > > http://www.michaelkenna.net/html/japan02/index.html > > http://www.sugimotohiroshi.com/seascape.html > > http://www.dimagemaker.com/article.php?articleID=1004 > > Its really sad that people fall for that kind of nonsense. > > John > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , "Tyler Boley" > <tyler@...> wrote: >> > >> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , "Wayne J. >> > Cosshall" <wcosshall1@> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Don't get it. Who's Michael Kenna? >> > >> > and there you have it. >> > -- Harry F. Lockwood [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: New art/photo website award profile
2007-05-26 by Harry Lockwood
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.