> Could you provide more info on "It uses no crossovers and no dilute inks." With the 100%, 3-channel Eboni setup, all the inks for B&W are 100% Eboni. There are no light inks. Recall that the R800 also uses no light color inks. The 1.5 pl dot is so small light inks are not needed for highlight smoothness. If there are no light inks, and the ink that is used for the highlights can also be used for the darkest black, the curves go from their 0 or off points to their top loads at the 100% black. No curve every goes into a negative slope. Where there are light inks in other systems, like the standard Epson hextone drivers, the light inks are used for the highlights, but then they are turned off as the darker inks are turned on for the more dense parts of the image. This is a "cross-over" between the light and dark inks. These transitions are the tricky and difficulty parts of most profiling jobs where the different density inks have to be carefully coordinated so that flat spots in the ramp don't result. There simple are no cross-overs in the system I'm now using. As such the profiling is easier and the curves will be more reliable. Note what happens to the quality control issues. They virtually disappear. There is no ink mixing by intermediaries. There are no problems with different batches of color inks being slightly off, because there are no color inks involved. I might add that the purist B&W types might want to run 3 or 4 Eboni channels and the rest just filled with cleaning fluid. If a nozzle check is not good, just swap channels -- put a cleaning cart in the clogged one and put Eboni in one of the spares that has had cleaning fluid in it. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: R800-1800 Eboni -- Comparison of LensWork split-tone to Photo R
2007-05-28 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.