Hello Ernst, >>The 100% carbon approach is not for maximum smoothness but for >>the most stable print. It uses no crossovers and no dilute inks. >>The only reason it is reasonably smooth is that it uses the 1.5 >>picoliter dots of the R800/1800, and it uses 3 channels to hide >>the microbanding. > >Which has been my theoretical advice for the best BO >printing possible when Clayton Jones wrote his first >messages on BO printing in this list and not everyone could >get the quality Clayton got. Next step in quality would be >more weaving strokes. I remember your recommendations in those days. I sort of grasped the concept but didn't have the technical know-how to implement it. It has taken Paul's knowledge to make it happen. I've been following this thread with much interest, and Paul recently sent me some print samples. >...At the same time the small black dots give the graphic >qualities Clayton liked: paper color less filtered overall, >ink color hardly visible, high detail contrast. It is by far the best BO I've seen - much smoother, random dither pattern without banding, and still has the qualities that make it such a powerful method, especially BO's beautiful black on the various papers. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
[Digital BW] Re: R800-1800 Eboni -- Comparison of LensWork split-tone to Photo R
2007-05-28 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.