David, I can only speak from my perspective, so. For sure there are tinkers out there that are always looking for the magic bullet. They would not be looking if they hadn't already found it though. We all hopefully have a vision that we would like to see on paper and to that end we are all tinkers. The ABW mode with the newer Epson printers can make some darn nice prints if you get in and tinker a little with tone, density, etc. so that it has been some what perfected. "The evident characteristic of the Advanced B&W mode is the almost perfect linearity" from Giorgio Trucco comments on Digital Outback. This was also supported by Roy's posting the other day where he posted the various ink output from both color and ABW mode. To correct for the excess color ink usage a well made ICC profile may be the answer. It seems that your profile is lacking is shadow detail? Is that what you mean by cleaner? Shadow contrast with detail? I am no expert on PFP and I can agree with you that while they give you the control over split toning a bit of tweaking is needed to continue with the punch at the bottom of the scale. A flaw in the default of PFP or just a preference that we don't share? Or lack of knowledge of the program? It sounds like you spent some time getting ABW to perform well, as did I. Do I use those setting that I developed? Sure do. Why?, because they work and with limited time, I have yet to come up with a better solution with PFP and extended grays. The over riding issue for some is permanence and they feel that some color pigments just don't provide the required time in this realm. Others are putting their trust in this ink set or that ink set. Why? Faith in the research and marketing hype? There is also the issue of control over the image. If you make it through dedicated practices that you understand and can manipulate there is for some a higher level of satisfaction in the end product. Eric Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 http://e.neilsen.home.att.net http://ericneilsenphotography.com Skype ejprinter _____ From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David Keenan Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 10:29 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] ABW vs. the world I have made many prints on an Epson R2400 using ABW mode and now that I have a 3800, I continue to rely on ABW. With my new 3800, I profiled all my papers over (too many) hours using the "extended gray" feature of the latest version of PrintFix Pro and did some print comparisons. The ABW prints were better in my (and other) opinions. The shadows were cleaner for sure. I haven't used my copy of QTR since my 2200 died and I replaced it with a R2400. Still for some reason I feel inadequate even though I am quite happy with the prints I make especially on Innova F-type paper... My burning question is why do other printers find using ICC profiles, dedicated inksets, QTR , etc. valuable and spend so much time with it all? Are their prints that much better then what the Epson driver can do in ABW to make all the extra work (hassle, in my opinion) worth it? Or do these printers have an inherent "tinkerers mentality" (that I clearly lack) that makes this fun for them and that's why they choose the extra effort? Bottomline -- does this effort show up in the prints? Dave. -- Portfolio: www.david-keenan.com/portfolio Web Site: www.david-keenan.com 2007 PAW: www.david-keenan.com/paw [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] ABW vs. the world
2007-06-02 by Eric Neilsen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.