³I've always edited for QTR in QTR Grey Lab colour space and printed using QTR Grey Matte. ³ This is not at all necessary. Edit in the workspace you prefer and convert to the output space ³on-the-fly² at printing. I use Gray Gamma 2.2 because it¹s a nice subset of Adobe RGB to which I send files from Adobe Camera Raw that are destined for B&W printing. (I use Pro Photo RGB for colour work.) If possible, I would not use QTR Grey Matte as your print space but rather use a profile generated for your printer. For this you need a densitometer at least. From: Richard Smallfield <r.smallfield@...> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:44:14 +1200 To: Digital BW Print <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Subject: [Digital BW] QTR Grey Lab icc Hi, I've always edited for QTR in QTR Grey Lab colour space and printed using QTR Grey Matte. I do this because it said to do it in the instructions. Printing in Grey Matte.icc makes sense, but what difference would it make if I edited in Grey Gamma 2.2 as, when it is converted to QTR Grey Matte for printing, surely it will end up the same? It's just a nuisance to have to convert to Grey Gamma 2.2 all the time whenever I want an image to display correctly on someone else's computer. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Richard [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] QTR Grey Lab icc
2007-06-10 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.