Digital BW, The Print

I have been using PM for years and haven't seen it yellow. Now I can't speak
to the new PM, but I have not seen any reports that suggest that it did or
will. Why would anyone put EEM and PM in the same sentence about yellowing?
Sure you can have a concern about brighteners and whiteness, but why imply
yellowing unless you've seen it?

 

Eric Neilsen Photography

4101 Commerce Street

Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

http://e.neilsen.home.att.net

http://ericneilsenphotography.com

Skype ejprinter

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of djon43
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007 8:37 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Red River Polar Matte (was Moab Kayenta > Lasal
...)

 

Polar Matte is as white as Kayenta, but it's very different otherwise.

Kayenta is two-sided, PM is one-sided. PM's surface seems identical to
EEM whereas Kayenta is lightly grained (I've not yet seen Lasal). 

PM is even whiter than EEM, cause for concern...will it yellow even
more rapidly than EEM? In my experience EEM starts yellowing in months
whereas Kayenta has shown no evidence in the two years I've used it.

Moab Entrada Bright, is not as extremely white as Polar Matte is said
to be more resistant to yellowing than many whitened cotton papers
because it's not AS white as they are. That was considered by Moab
when they created the paper. 

Some say alpha-cellulose has a whiteness permanance advantage over
cotton because it's not whitened in the same way...it isn't a
fundamentally non-white (natural/cream) paper the way cotton papers
all are. 

--- In DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "alistair_owens"
<owens@...> wrote:
>
> Does the coating have brighteners? I guess it must have to achieve the 
> bright white.
>

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]