> If you convert to monochrome in the channel mixer the three different > channels WILL look different. channel mixer isn't involved if one is scanning silver B&W... I don't know if you used > to shoot with different b&w films years ago but if you compared the > same shot of a colourful subjecttaken with Tri-X and say Plus X they > were very different as the films reacted to different colours differently. Not in my experience or for practical purposes (that's what B&W filters are for), but it'd be interesting to confirm. It's technically true that different panchromatic B&W films have different spectral responses but I don't think it's relevant for practical purposes. I shoot silver film now, have since 1951 (I was 8). All readily available films but Verichrome Pan and Kodalith, and perhaps some technical films, have been fully "panchromatic." > I personally don't use the Mixer method to convert to B&W but use the Lab method and prefer those results. The method is explained on theweb if you do a search. Try it and see what you think. It is good and much better than Desaturate. > Jules Neither Channel mixer nor Desaturate are relevant as Bruce Watson is scanning Tri X. They would be relevant if he was shooting color film for B&W. > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Bruce Watson > <bwyg@> wrote: > > > > howg2211 wrote: > > > I am just starting to try my hand at black and white digital imaging > > > and am actually starting with a Holga and a pinhole camera using Kodak > > > Tri-X. I
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Scanning Black and White With Vuescan
2007-07-15 by djon43
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.