Sandy King's response to my query: I am suggesting scanning B&W negatives in RGB, but only if they were developed in a pyro staining developer. Negatives developed in non-staining developers should be scanned in grayscale as there is no advantage to scanning in RGB. And yes, if memory and file size is not an issue I would recommend scanning stained negatives in RGB and then looking at the channels to see which one (s) give the best tonal range. In most cases there is no advantage over scanning grayscale, but sometimes there is. Sandy At 7:43 AM -0700 7/16/07, john kelly wrote: >Sandy, thanks.. > >I may be missing something here... > >Are you suggesting scan of stained B&W negs as color >neg or transparency, then reviewing channels? > >Do you think this is better than scanning as B&W? > >I understand the file size issue, but if memory wasn't >an issue, would you scan B&W stained negs as B&W or as >color? > >Is there any argument for scanning non-stained B&W >negs as color?
Message
STAINED B&W Vs conventional B&W negs
2007-07-16 by djon43
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.