Yes, We all have standards and those depend on the image. So if these hold a special place in your heart, I'd agree with Stephen and try a "save as" to TIF and upscale in PS to a little larger. You can also use Lightroom to resize and see if that makes you happy. Lastly your output would be best served by using a RIP or Qimage. The 50KB file is just too small for my taste but some 800KB can get to a 8x10 if the subject works OK. I also suspect that noise may be a big issue as well as the pixilation. Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 http://e.neilsen.home.att.net http://ericneilsenphotography.com Skype ejprinter _____ From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of petegorsky@... Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 8:44 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] JPEG SIZE Mark is probably right, but if you wanted to experiment, you could try copying the files, saving them as TIFFs, and then upscaling them using either an application like Genuine Fractals, or resizing them in Photoshop in 10% increments of increasing size. If you're using a RIP like Imageprint, you may not need to get as many pixels per inch as you think in order to get a nice looking print. Stephen Petegorsky Quoting stanleybutterfass <swb@... <mailto:swb%40bpmi.com> >: > I have some very old digital images shot with a Sony Mavica. They range > from 50KB to 800KB. I would like to print them in B&W. Might there be a > way of improving the quality since the size is so small? I would like > at least 8x10 prints prefably 11x14. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] JPEG SIZE
2007-08-03 by Eric Neilsen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.