Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Archiving Digital Photos

2007-08-14 by Mark Rogers

I don't feel the critical issue is who has control. The real problem 
is that nothing is 100% reliable, not Raid5, not internet backup, not 
CD/DVDsÂ…NOTHING. Lighting, Fire, Atmospheric pollutants, and 
bankruptcy can and will destroy anything. That is why you have to 
have at least two copies, in independent locations on media that is 
replaced every few years. If offsite company X files bankruptcy you 
have your hard drive copy. If buglers steal your PC with the 
redundant raid you have your Offsite internet backup or your CD/DVD's 
in a safe deposit box.

Cheers,
Mark
Frame Destination, Inc.
http://www.framedestination.com

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Dennis W. 
Manasco" <dmanasco@...> wrote:
>
> At 2:25 PM -0700 8/12/07, Chris Wong wrote:
> 
> >Smugmug.com uses Amazon's S3 technology which has at least 3 
> >redundant copies of your data distributed.
> 
> So?
> 
> If SmukMuck tanks, you tank.
> 
> That's the whole point:
> 
> If you let your non-replaceable data out of your hands you lose 
control.
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.