Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Large 100% carbon display prints

2007-08-17 by Paul Roark

Hi Scott,

>Wouldn't this "3" system also work in a 4800, since it 
>already has three black ink positions?

It has larger dots than the R1800, however.  So, it would have graininess
close to the 2200 I've been experimenting with to see how large display
prints would look.  My conclusion there is that with the right paper, large
display prints will probably be fine, but for smaller prints the graininess
is probably more than most would like to see.

>Is is possible to use Eboni in the MK position, and diluted 
> Eboni in the Lk and LLK position?

Dilute Eboni is no longer neutral.  It gets warm just like the other dilute
carbon inks.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 

__________________________


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@...> wrote:
>
> The primary downside, from my perspective, of the R1800 100% carbon 
workflow
> I'm now using (see http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/R1800.pdf) is 
that the
> R1800 is limited to 13" wide paper, whereas I often make larger 
prints - 16
> x 20 inches and above. There is no large format printer that uses 
the small
> 1.5 picoliter drops of the R1800. However, using the 2200 as a 
test bed,
> I've made some profiles that appear to make good, 100% carbon large 
prints
> with K2 printers with MIS LK and Eboni in the usual K2 UC 
positions. See
> http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/K2-Eboni-LK.pdf I think this 
will allow
> those using the R1800 3-MK 100% carbon workflow to outsource their 
larger
> prints to those who have larger K2 printers and use MIS LK and 
Eboni MK.
> 
> 
> 
> Paul
> 
> www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.