>I assume that R800 and R220 are printer numbers, >but I don't know what 3MK and UT-3D mean? The 220 was a great bargain and ran the UT-3D inkset -- see http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/UT-3D_Readme.pdf Unfortunately, the 220 is not longer made. The R800 (and R1800) were the first to use the very small 1.5 picoliter drops. As such, they are also the first to be able to print what I consider photo quality, 100% carbon prints. See http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/R1800.pdf I'm personally trying to move all my printing to 100% carbon to avoid the problems color inks introduce. The R800/1800 setup also allows color printing, but not glossy -- just matte. Custom B&W only setups could easily also print glossy, but I thought the full color + B&W would be the more popular (and I needed color for a project). So that is what I set up first. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: smaller printer for mainly black and white?
2007-08-19 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.