I find Nikonscan has no advantage whatsoever beyond its unique, wonderful operation the motorized Nikon carrier...its precisely positioning C41 and unmounted E6 without effort cause me to choose Nikonscan for those films despite my general preference for Vuescan's front end (I use Vuescan with mounted E6). My film, even my ancient stuff, is normally very clean (old stuff in glassines, new stuff in polyester, nothing in polyethylene)...therefore I think Vuescan's unique ability to do LIGHTER cleaning than Nikonscan is an advantage. Ice/Infared are both great for routine airborn dust and minor abrasions, but neither rivals Photoshop and time if the film has suffered bad storage, dirty drying or especially enthusiastic minilab handling. Maybe I'd like the more brutal Ice/Infared settings if I commonly dealt with bad film.
Message
Re: Film Developing Recommendations
2007-08-21 by john kelly
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.