Awesome, Paul. Thanks. Mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> wrote: > > >Just wondering what the latest info is on fade resistance of > >MIS UT7 inks, especially versus Piezography. > > My tests of the MIS UT inks v. the Cone PiezoTone inkset showed them to be > essentially equal. MIS UT neutral beat the selenium by just a hair, but > that was probably too little to be significant. I consider them equal. > > One thing I do want to mention, however, is that the UT7 sepia uses magenta > and yellow to get there. Cone's sepia is a carbon -- perhaps a weak carbon, > but still, I'd assume, stronger than the UT7 sepia approach. > > >The Cone Web site claims Piezography inks outperform MIS-FS ... > > The MIS inks were an older generation of the MIS inks -- pre "UT," which is > the prefix that designates the current MIS B&W inks. The published Cone > fade test is irrelevant to the MIS UT inksets -- totally different. When > I've tested the neutral, same-generation inksets against each other no Cone > inkset has ever beat an MIS inkset. Again, I consider them equal if the > same generation inksets are tested against each other. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Latest info on ink fade resistance - MIS UT7 versus Cone?
2007-09-13 by Mark McCarvill
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.