I am, quite frankly, more shocked by the strength and quality of the
responses on this list than I was by the rather lurid quality of the
photographs that were presented to us.
As somebody who has posted very little on this list, I still have
felt that a single notice of a show involving my black and white work
would be tolerated or accepted. (I'd not expect to announce color
shows, which is most of what I'm doing now.) It appears that the
issue is not a lurker trying to post an ad, but something more
related to the content of the images.
Yes ... the images in question certainly stretch my definition of
"art". But I can easily choose to ignore them, and to look at or
create other images instead. I did notice some nudes that were much
less sexual than the other images. Had those be presented by
themselves, without the sexual/erotic photography text, I doubt that
they would have created any significant stir.
Back to monitor calibration, step wedges, and Epson's monopolistic
practices. . .
Arthur Fink
A r t h u r . F i n k . P h o t o g r a p h y
-------------------------------------------------
Ten New Island Avenue . land 207.766.5722
Peaks Island, Maine 04108 . cell 207.615.5722
www.arthurfinkphoto.com . af@...
More dance images www.f64gallery.com/arthur.html
www.arthurfinkphoto.com/BatesShow2007Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shameless self promotion - Cross Posted
2007-09-27 by Arthur Fink
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.