Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Anyone try Harman Gloss FB AL?

2007-10-04 by Max Dee

the paper & coat are so soft that I see roller marks ....the product is unusable in its current form

gcwagner <gcwagner@...> wrote:          I printed my test using a 3800 and Epson K3 inks.
I have not had an issue with surface fragility yet but I have not really
tried to scuff it up.
My Dmax reading were 2.33 30 minutes after printing and 2.23 12 hours after
printing. Dmin. .03.
Gary W.
-----Original Message-----
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Dana H.
Myers
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 8:36 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Anyone try Harman Gloss FB AL?

Steven Karafyllakis wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Gary;
>
> This one is next on my list, if only because it got such a glowing
> review on Luminous Landscape...which inks did you use with it? any
> trouble with the surface fragility others have reported?

I've compared Museo Silver Rag, Innova Fiba-Print White Ultra-Smooth
Gloss and Harman Gloss FB Al in the last few weeks, all using standard
Epson UltraChrome K3 inks on an R2400.

I created monochrome ICC profiles using PrintFixPRO. My measurements
were:

Museo Silver Rag: Dmin 0.04, Dmax 2.54
Innova Fiba-Print White Ultra-Smooth Gloss: Dmin 0.05, Dmax 2.50
Harman Gloss FB Al: Dmin 0.03, Dmax 2.37

.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



                         

       
---------------------------------
Shape Yahoo! in your own image.  Join our Network Research Panel today!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.