Thanks for the reply Jon. As much as I would like to write the President, I'm on the other side of the 49th parallel. In any case, I wish you much luck with this, for the sake of printers up here too. Jens --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@...> wrote: > > Jens, > > The ruling only affects printers with on-carriage cartridges and these > are 13" and smaller. The 3800 uses remote ink carts, but I do not > think anyone has yet made a CIS or cartridge for that printer. > > The best thing you can do besides writing the President which will be > a pro-active feeling, is buying a supply of CIS systems. They too are > subject to the ruling and you will want to act quick as supplies will > run out. But hoarding cartridges is not a good idea. Switch to bottles > as its more economical and will allow you to continue buying inks for > a long time. Even a hoard of cartridges eventually runs out. > > The sale of inks is not affected nor does it affect carts for large > format printers (off-carriage). However, most large format printmakers > use refillable carts anyway to reduce costs. > > I think that refilling is also the best solution for the ecology. > While the impact of b&w is small on the environment, the impact of > color is huge. But any individual effort to not throw away a cartridge > is a great effort as far as the environment is concerned. I live in > Vermont and how we manage waste is very strict here. > > The biggest impact will be on new desktop users who will never have > the chance to try. Existing users will find their way or upgrade to > larger formats. > > It also does not affect our European customers who can continue to buy > desktop cartridges from our European resellers. But Europe will not be > allowed to sell into the USA, because USA does not have free-trade > like the EU enjoys. > > regards, > > Jon Cone > > PS please write the President - you just never know.... > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "JensGerbitz" > <jensgerbitz@> wrote: > > > > Can someone clarify whether the 3800, or any 17" printer, would be > > considered desk-top, i.e. affected by this law? > > > > I guess this means that people should stock up on cartridges asap... > > I have a 1280 and R220. > > > > Also, I'm assuming that the sale of ink won't be affected directly. > > In the long run (as new desk top printers are introduced to market) > > it probably would be due to falling demand because of the lack of > > refillable cartridges. > > > > This is not great news. > > > > Jens > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" > > <deanwork2003@> wrote: > > > > > > There has also recently been a successful lawsuit against makers of > > > carts cloned from HP and HP won. I'm not sure about Canon. > > > > > > It seems to me, though I know little of the specifics of engineering > > > these things, that what is needed is a totally unique ink delivery > > > system for desktop units that does not infringe upon the patents > > held > > > by these corporations. From a user persective it appears that 3rd > > > party ink manufacturers have depended on almost exact copies of > > > Epson's chipped carts and hoped for the best. Even the cis units use > > > Epson cloned carts in them. Now they will be highly motivated to > > > create their own totally uniqe designs, possibly made here in the US > > > to avoid the import fears that foreign companies certainly will > > > respond to. If end users can fill their own from bulk inks it may > > end > > > up being a postive thing for us consumers. Buying little quantities > > of > > > ink in tiny carts is a rip off anyway in my opinion, regardess who > > > fills them. > > > > > > I'll be there will be a lot more court battles to come though. As of > > > right now Epson has the small desktop suppliers on the run. I think > > we > > > all knew this was going to happen eventually. Of course Bush is > > going > > > to sign it, if he can read it. He might have to have Cheney read it > > to > > > him and show him where to sign though. > > > > > > john > > > > > >
Message
Re: Epson's court victory
2007-11-01 by JensGerbitz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.