My intention with the initial post was to get the information out there, this is huge for some of us, and I hoped that would result in others interested in keeping this form of printing alive might do the letter writing or whatever they can. I have no idea where or not it will help, it certainly can't hurt. Thanks to Paul and other we now have more information on how best to be affective. I have long ranted there should be a secondary line of printers for us that are unchipped and priced so their viability does not depend on ink sales. Of course that won't happen at the desktop level. But more directly, here's how it "may" impact bulk ink availability. It's safe to assume that a huge part of income for these small companies is sales of carts. One can imagine that those sales are a larger amount than their total margin. A sudden end to cart sales may mean a sudden start to debt accumulation for them. Therefore, without a way to quickly adapt, downsize, or find another high volume product to quickly take it's place, the companies themselves may bag it entirely, and therefore no more ink... All the peripheral discussion about politics etc, while no doubt sincere, should not deflect us from sitting down and writing the letters. That's the deal. Then... come what may... we did something rather than nothing. Tyler --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> wrote: > > >... > > Assuming that the CIS continues to work properly, will > > my ability to purchase inks be affected by this lawsuit? > > I don't believe Epson will be able to stop third party bulk ink sales. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson's court victory
2007-11-02 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.