> From: Dana H. Myers > > It's what patent law is all about; you craft an invention > and spend the time and money to patent it, you get protection > in return. Further, if a patent holder doesn't vigorously > defend their patent claim, this can be used to invalidate the > patent. That's likely why Epson goes to the expense to > litigate on infringement that is likely inconsequential to > their business - if they don't do this, then HP or some > Chinese knock-off could infringe and then win in court, which > would have a huge impact on Epson's business. What I don't understand is why no one has mentioned the possibility of licensing from Epson. I would think they'd be willing to to do that for some reasonable amount, like a buck a cart or something. Makers of cheap ink for people who want to print web pages wouldn't be able to afford it, but I don't care about them. I care about people who sell "fine art" inksets that provide some advantage over Epson, such as the B&W inksets everyone uses here. I don't really care if they cost a bit more than Epson carts, because price isn't why I buy them. -- Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco Paul mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Epson's court victory
2007-11-03 by Paul D. DeRocco
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.